crazyforcars: I love that someone grafted a 164 nose onto a wagon…why didn’t Volvo do that in the first place?
Pop-upView Separately

crazyforcars:

I love that someone grafted a 164 nose onto a wagon…why didn’t Volvo do that in the first place?

(via wagonation)

Source: crazyforcars

33 Notes/ Hide

  1. groovyiseverything reblogged this from crazyforcars
  2. heydontlickthat reblogged this from crazyforcars and added:
    Too bad they grafted the ugly (later) 164 front end instead of the sexier early version. lol
  3. sevwen7 reblogged this from slowracer
  4. worldissmall reblogged this from fuckyeahvolvo and added:
    yes, why???
  5. katherimz reblogged this from crazyforcars
  6. joenlaw reblogged this from fuckyeahvolvo
  7. slowracer reblogged this from fuckyeahvolvo
  8. threephin reblogged this from fuckyeahvolvo and added:
    They probably grafted a wagon onto a 164, the stretched frame up front makes it more than just a little body work.
  9. threexstan reblogged this from fuckyeahvolvo
  10. fuckyeahvolvo reblogged this from wagonation
  11. bentestedbenapproved reblogged this from wagonation
  12. turnerbudds-carblog reblogged this from crazyforcars
  13. wagonation reblogged this from crazyforcars
  14. twincharged reblogged this from crazyforcars
  15. crazyforcars posted this